Why Security Providers Are Solving the Wrong Problems
Many security providers claim to solve the challenges with detection, but they’re still relying on the outdated detection methodologies that cause those challenges in the first place. Their solutions typically fall into at least one of two categories:
1. Taking control of your data to handle detection building, deployment, and management for you.
2. Offering tools that detect threats within a single technology, such as endpoints, network traffic, firewalls, or cloud environments
These approaches, while well-intentioned, don’t address the root problems and create even more challenges:
Lack of Transparency: Many providers use a black-box approach, keeping you in the dark about how your detections work and how well they’re performing.
Costly Data Centralization: Sending all your data to a provider is time consuming and expensive, and it becomes even more costly as data ingest grows.
Siloed Rules: The provided detection technologies often don’t talk to each other, so the rules built and managed by providers are still uncoordinated across technologies, slowing response times.
Neglected Rule Management: Providers rarely monitor, test, or share the performance of their rules, leaving you uncertain about their reliability.
To outpace threats and gain confidence in your detection strategy, your organization needs a fundamentally different approach. ReliaQuest built its GreyMatter agentic AI security operations platform with this approach in mind.